Illinois Civil Union Partners Soon May Enjoy Greater Leave Rights Than Married Couples Under a Newly Proposed Illinois Family Medical Leave Act

civil union ring.jpgIllinois currently has no equivalent of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act.  Soon, it may.  And unlike the FMLA, the proposed Illinois leave law would allow civil union partners the same leave entitlements currently enjoyed by married couples.  Notably, because of the conflicting parameters of state and federal law, the proposed Illinois Family and Medical Leave Act, which recently hit the floor of Illinois House of Representatives, actually would afford civil union partners greater leave benefit rights than married couples.

Let me explain.

The Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act, which became law on June 1, 2011, provides that partners in a civil union are entitled to the same rights, benefits and privileges as those in traditional marriages.  Under this Act, wherever the term "spouse" appears within any Illinois statute, it must be read to include "partners in a civil union."

Like its federal counterpart, the Illinois FMLA would extend leave benefits to "spouses."  Because "civil union partners" are now the equivalent of "spouses" in Illinois under the Civil Union Act, civil union partners would be able to take leave to care for their civil union partner under the Illinois FMLA.

This leaves employers with operations in Illinois in a bit of an inadvertent quandary.  Currently, civil union partners cannot utilize leave rights under the federal FMLA because it is governed by the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines marriage as between one man and one woman.  So, if an employee in a civil union takes leave to care for his/her partner under the proposed Illinois FMLA, it would count against the leave entitlement under Illinois law, but not under the FMLA

To illustrate, let's pretend I am your employee and a partner to a civil union.  I also am otherwise eligible for leave under the FMLA and the proposed Illinois FMLA (meaning, I have worked for you for 12 months and have worked 1,250 hours in the past 12 months).  If I take a two-week leave of absence to care for my partner with a serious health condition, I will have exhausted two weeks of Illinois leave, but I have not exhausted any portion of my 12 weeks of FMLA leave (because FMLA, of course, does not recognize my civil union).  In theory, I could take up to 24 weeks of leave in a 12-month period -- 12 weeks under the Illinois FMLA to care for my civil union partner, and 12 weeks for any eligible reason under the FMLA.

Insights for Employers

If the Illinois FMLA becomes law, we will advise employers further.  In the meantime, let me address a more immediate issue.  Over the past several years, I have counseled employers who voluntarily have chosen to provide federal FMLA leave to domestic and civil union partners.  Clearly, this is a growing phemonenon among Fortune 500 companies and leading business.  

Keep in mind as you develop these FMLA leave policies: if your policy provides employees leave to care for a domestic or civil union partner, employers cannot count this leave under the employee's 12-week FMLA allotment, since (as noted above) the FMLA does not recognize these relationships.  To ensure that you are not unintentionally setting yourself up for an FMLA interference claim when providing leave to domestic or civil union partners, we recommend that employers contact their employment counsel for guidance as to best practices in this area. 

Ruh Roh Raggy! A Leave of Absence to Care for Your Pet?

golden-retriever-boys-best-friend.jpgI love my Golden Retriever, Abby.  I really do.  But this development below is a bit too much, especially for this management-side attorney. 

Is it possible that employees in Florida soon may be eligible to take a leave of absence when their pets are abused or subjected to the threat of abuse?  As Eric Meyer at the Employer Handbook reports, it is indeed! 

Under Florida state law, employees currently are eligible to take leave if the employee or a family or household member is the victim of “domestic violence” and the leave requested relates to the domestic violence.  However, pets in Florida may soon have some protections, too!  Under legislation proposed by State Senator Mike Fasano, the existing Florida domestic violence statute would be amended so that the definition of “domestic violence” would now include “inflicting, or attempting to inflict, physical injury against a [pet], … or placing a family or household member in fear of physical harm to a [pet].”

Based on our quick research, Florida is the only state considering a move to protect employees and their beloved pets, and even there, passage of this legislation is unlikely.  Wow, what will they think of next?

Parental Bereavement Act Would Amend FMLA to Provide Leave Upon Death of a Child

Earlier this month, Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) introduced the Parental Bereavement Act (S. 1358), which would expand the Family and Medical Leave Act to provide job-protected leave due to the death of an employee's son or daughter.  In a press release, Sen. Tester said he introduced the bill because the "last thing [parents] should be worrying about is whether they’ll lose their jobs as they deal with life-changing loss."  The Act would allow leave "because of the death of a son or daughter," and it assumes leave would be taken in one block.  Like bonding leave, bereavement leave could be taken intermittently only if the employer agrees.  Like the FMLA itself, the bill would apply only to employers of 50 or more employees.

Although the Parental Bereavement Act currently has no co-sponsors, it likely has a better chance of passage than the recently-introduced FMLA Inclusion Act (H.R. 2364, S. 1283), which would provide unpaid leave to care for a same-sex spouse or partner, parent-in-law, adult child, sibling, grandchild or grandparent.  The latter bill, which has been introduced in Congress several times before, likely would not enjoy the support of a Republican-controlled House of Representatives, even if it were to pass the Senate. 

These bills are among several legislative initiatives that have been introduced in Congress over the past year to amend (and often enlarge) the scope of the FMLA.  The latest proposal under the Parental Bereavement Act is intriguing, since it builds upon a grass roots initiative imploring Congress to pass legislation providing job-protected leave upon the death of a child.  The initiative is led by Kelly Farley and Barry Kluger, both of whom lost children at a very young age.  Realizing that he could not take FMLA-protected leave upon his daughter's death (because it is not provided for under the FMLA), Farley instead submitted FMLA paperwork seeking leave to care for his wife, who was dealing with depression in the aftermath of the tragic event.  In reality, he suggests, he needed leave to care for himself. 

Connecticut Poised to Become First State to Mandate Paid Sick Leave

Paid sick leave.jpgAs state governments across the country scramble to plug large holes in their own budgets, they are digging deeper into employers' pockets.  Earlier this week, the Connecticut General Assembly passed legislation that will require employers within the service sector (and with more than 50 employees) to provide paid sick leave to their employees, making the state the first in the country to pass such legislation.  (The Connecticut governor has indicated his signature soon will follow.)

As reported by Daniel Schwartz in the Connecticut Employment Law Blog, "service" workers within the state will accrue 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 40 hours worked, up to a maximum of 40 hours or 5 business days.  According to the New York Times, the legislation will cover approximately 200,000 to 400,000 workers, including waiters, cashiers, fast-food cooks, hair stylists, security guards and nursing home aides.  However, it exempts manufacturers, nonprofits, as well as salaried workers, independent contractors, temporary workers and day laborers.

Employees will be able to carry over up to 5 days paid sick leave each year.  Under the legislation, employees would be able to use paid sick leave for their own or their child's or spouse's health condition; medical diagnosis, care or treatment of a health condition; or preventative medical care.  Paid sick leave also could be utilized for time off if the employee is a victim of family violence or sexual assault. 

Insights for Employers

A few municipalities have enacted paid sick leave legislation (San Francisco in 2006; Washington D.C. and Milwaukee in 2008), but Connecticut is the first state to do so.  And as reported by the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, even more cities and states are poised to make the jump to mandatory paid leave for employees.  Other states, like California, have considered similar proposals (the latest bill would have mandated seven paid days), but do not yet have the votes to pass such legislation.  Notably, the National Partnership for Women and Families reports (pdf) that 20 cities and states currently are considering some form of paid sick leave for employees.  

At a time when Congress has stalled in passing legislation to broaden the Family and Medical Leave Act, many states appear ready to take the baton and run with it.  Employers across the country should be mindful of sick leave legislation pending in their own state to determine how such legislation might impact their business.

Webinar Covers Changes to ADAAA, Effect on FMLA

Last week, my colleagues, Bill Pokorny and Josh Meeuwse, and I conducted a complimentary Webinar for our clients and friends of the firm regarding the ADA Amendments Act and its final regulations, which take effect May 24, 2011. 

You now can access the archived version of the Webinar and the presentation materials here.  The Webinar provides an overview of the changes to the ADAAA and its regulations and offers strategies for avoiding and defending against potential disability discrimination claims. 

Effect on the FMLA: The ADAAA significantly expands the number of employees who are considered "disabled."  Consequently, employees who suffer from serious health conditions covered by the Family and Medical Leave Act now also may be covered by the ADAAA.  While covering several common workplace issues, our Webinar specifically addresses how to handle an employee who has exhausted FMLA leave but needs additional leave before returning to work. 

For additional information about the ADAAA and how it will impact your workplace, you also can access our comprehensive summary of the ADAAA final regulations here (pdf).

Where FMLA Bonding Leave is at Issue, Unmarried Parents Have More Generous Leave Rights

The folks at the California Public Agency Labor and Employment blog yesterday raised an issue that has popped up from time to time with our own clients: When it comes to "baby bonding" leave, does the Family and Medical Leave Act provide more generous benefits for unmarried parents than it does for married parents?  In short, the answer is Yes.

Under the FMLA, where both husband and wife work for the same employer, they are entitled to a combined 12 weeks of bonding leave per FMLA year.  (See 29 CFR 825.120(a)(3))  So, what if mom and dad both work for the same employer but are not married?  In what can only be described as a loophole in the FMLA, the unmarried parents do not have to split the 12 weeks -- each may take up to 12 weeks of bonding leave. 

As the California L&E blog points out, this contrasts with state FMLA laws (like the California Family Rights Act) where bonding leave is limited to a combined 12 weeks for the parents, regardless of whether they are married or not.  Perhaps an intended result, but one employers must be mindful of when administering FMLA leave.

Illinois Civil Unions and the FMLA

same-sex couple.JPGIn a ceremony to be held later today at the Chicago Cultural Center, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn will sign a law allowing same and opposite-sex couples to enter into civil unions. Under the law, such couples are "entitled to the same legal obligations, responsibilities, protections and benefits as are afforded or recognized by the law of Illinois to spouses, whether they derive from statute, administrative rule, policy, common law, or any other source of civil or criminal law." But what effect will this new law have on employees' rights under federal laws like the FMLA?

The FMLA regulations provide that the meaning of the term "spouse" is defined by state law: 

Spouse. Spouse means a husband or wife as defined or recognized under State law for purposes of marriage in the state where the employee resides, including common law marriage in States where it is recognized.

Because the FMLA relies upon the state's definition of "spouse," and because the new civil union law says that parties to a civil union have the same rights and responsibilities as spouses for purposes of state law, one could make the argument that the new law extends FMLA rights to couples joined in a civil union. However, that argument is not likely to carry the day in court, at least for the time being.

Continue Reading

Senator Dodd's Legacy: The Family and Medical Leave Act

Dodd picture.jpgIn the upcoming weeks, the halls of Congress will welcome a number of new faces and bid farewell to many other personalities.  One of those personalities riding into the sunset is the longtime Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut.  Putting aside for now whether you love him or hate him, Senator Dodd leaves at least one significant legacy behind -- passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act.  As the author of the FMLA, which was passed in 1993, and sponsor of several bills pending in Congress that would expand the FMLA, Senator Dodd clearly has been a strong voice for employees in the workplace.

Continue Reading

New Law Modifies Military Family Leave In Illinois

The Illinois Family Military Leave Act allows eligible employees who are the spouse or parent of a person called to military service to take unpaid leave during the family member's military service. Under the law, employees who work for an employer with more than 50 employees may take up to 30 days of leave. Employees working for employers with 15 to 50 employees can take up to 15 days of family military leave. Presently, this leave is in addition to the family military leave leave available under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act.

A new law recently signed by Governor Quinn amends the Family Military Leave Act to extend leave to children and grandparents of service members as well as spouses or parents. However, if an employee also uses "qualifying exigency" leave under the FMLA, the amount of leave available under the Illinois law will be reduced by the number of days the employee takes under the FMLA.

The amendment takes effect January 1, 2011.

FMLA Inclusion Act Introduced in Congress . . . again

Is the fifth time the charm?  On July 30, 2010, U.S. Senator Richard Durbin introduced the Family and Medical Leave Inclusion Act, which would broaden the Family and Medical Leave Act to permit leave to care for a same-sex spouse, domestic partner, parent-in-law, adult child, sibling, or grandparent who has a serious health condition.  S.B. 3680 (pdf) is nearly identical to H.B. 2132, which has been pending in the U.S. House of Representatives, and that (based on our count) has been introduced in the House on four occasions.  What's notable about S.B. 3680, of course, is that it now is on track to be considered by the Senate for the first time. 

Does this signal renewed support for a fairly drastic expansion of the FMLA (i.e., extension of eligiblity to domestic partners, adult children, siblings and grandparents)?  Too soon to tell, given that Sen. Durbin is the only Senate sponsor right now.  However, the Senator claims to have momentum on his side.  In remarks introducing the legislation and citing the Human Rights Campaign, Senator Durbin suggested (pdf) that federally mandated family and medical leave protections keep up with 461 major American corporations, nine states, and the District of Columbia, all of which currently provide varying levels of FMLA benefits to same-sex partners.

The FMLA Inclusion Act is one of several bills pending in Congress that would further expand the FMLA.  Despite the number, none has been able to gain any momentum in the 111th Congress.

Illinois State Treasurer Extends FMLA Benefits to Employees with Same-Sex Partners

same-sex couple.JPGGay and lesbian employees in the Illinois Treasurer's office who are in a committed relationship will enjoy the same FMLA benefits as married employees under an executive order signed by state treasurer (and U.S. Senate candidate) Alexi Giannoulias Sunday.  As a result, these employees will have the same family and medical leave benefits to care for their domestic partner when they suffer from a serious health condition and will be allowed to take time off to have or adopt children.

Continue Reading

Pending Legislation Would Significantly Expand FMLA Leave Entitlements for Employees

Last fall, Congress passed and the President signed several amendments to the Family and Medical Leave Act, including an expansion of military leave (2010 Defense Department Authorization Bill) and a relaxation of the hours requirement for airline employees (Airline Flight Crew Technical Corrections Act).

Congress' willingness to amend portions of the FMLA in 2009 may be a sign of things to come in 2010.  The above FMLA legislation constitutes just a fraction of the FMLA bills under consideration in Congress.  Click on the link below for a summary of FMLA legislation currently pending in Congress as well as its status.

Continue Reading